Although there are many things in Russian favor in WT. That's why most people don't take you serious when you bring the argument of biased Russians. So it's comfortable and easy to just say "Russian Bias" and be done with it. The question is: Is this Bias, Coincedence or due to the wrong analysis of statistics? "Russian Bias" is a doomed argument, due to the high amout of people abusing it - they simply feel cheated or don't understand why exactly they lost a fight. Additionally, they have some planes in their lineup that never, or very limited saw combat. ), the cannons are most of the time way better than their German, Japanese or British counterparts, the SB-2 bomber line is still capable of out-turning most fighters and so on.Īlso, if you compare the actual dates of introcution of planes, it's obvious that many Russian planes are undertiered. Russian biplanes from 1939 are standing against other biplanes from 1935, Russian MG's are acting like miniguns (I-16, I-153. Same happens with other nations sometimes (Beaufighter, FW190 D-13) though.īut the Russian tree is perhaps the wierdest one. Yes, there were situations where Russian tech was way above realism and/or balance.
0 kommentar(er)
